Comparing Software Operating Ratios at 3 Different Revenue Levels
We recently launched our On-Demand Dashboards to assist technology CFOs and operating executives to evaluate and manage their performance relative to that of peer companies. OPEXEngine On-Demand Dashboards allow users to QUICKLY ASSEMBLY and DOWNLOAD OPERATING BENCHMARK reports for US-based publicly traded companies using the EDGAR Online database of SEC filings. Subscribers can instantly compare dozens of operating metrics for up to 10 operating companies at a time, for any reporting period.
To demonstrate the value of our new tool, we used the On-Demand Dashboards to analyze a universe of companies that fall into 3 different sized categories. The results generated some interesting comparisons for 2008 year-end results.
We created Financial Dashboards for 3 groups of publicly traded, mid-sized software companies in the following revenue categories:
|
The Financial Dashboard automatically calculates an average for each metric across companies, so it was easy to analyze performance across each category. The averages for year over year revenue growth and 3 year CAGR were relatively high for the groups with smaller companies because we chose to look at minimum growth levels to set these benchmarks. The second and third size categories have the additional challenge of growing off of a larger base and often have entered a stage where revenue growth is tempered by a successful focus on profit margins. For this reason, the mix includes some companies with slower revenue growth, but they have solid profitability. Average operating margins were clearly different for each of the 3 size categories for some metrics. Yet, some metrics, such as DSO and employee productivity were surprisingly similar for the largest and the smallest revenue bands. Following are a few examples:
|
|
Metrics
|
$70M - $120M
|
$120M - $250M
|
$250M - $400M
|
|
Year over year revenue growth
|
56.6%
|
42.2%
|
43.7%
|
|
S&M as a % of Revenue
|
49.0%
|
36.0%
|
38.5%
|
|
G&A as a % of Revenue
|
18.3%
|
12.5%
|
13.4%
|
|
R&D as a % of Revenue
|
17.9%
|
14.5%
|
15.1%
|
|
DSO
|
73.8
|
59.6
|
73.5
|
|
Cash Ratio
|
2.16
|
2.24
|
0.81
|
|
Revenue per employee
|
$331
|
$269
|
$347
|
Of course, averages are impacted by the peer companies chosen. We also found individual results insightful with some companies deviating from the average, both positively and negatively. Go create your own On-Demand Dashboard by clicking here and create a Financial Dashboard of companies you select.
In this tough economic environment, good benchmarks that help position your company against market leaders, peers and competitors is more critical than ever. Our clients use our On-Demand Dashboards to align management teams with board expectations, develop or reassess budget plans, and to present a competitive landscape to investors or creditors. We are also available to develop custom financial reports with additional metrics. Feel free to contact the staff at OPEXEngine directly at lauren@opexengine.com or 781-891-4149. |
|
H1 2008 R&D Benchmarks for SaaS Vendors (11/08)
We take a look at H1 2008 R&D for 10 SaaS companies. Software companies over the next year will have to balance a focus on selling what they have already developed and eliminating R&D "wish lists" to keep R&D budgets under control, but at the same time, investing enough in strategic R&D to maintain product leadership and ensure high levels of customer satisfaction. We believe that benchmarking is critical for software companies to see what peer companies are accomplishing with the same resources. See our report on 1H 2008 R&D benchmarks to see the results.
|
|
H108 S&M Expense Trends (10/08)
This month we examined H1'08 Sales and Marketing expenses for 10 publicly traded SaaS vendors. It is interesting to observe how these leading vendors placed their bets in the first half of this year as they navigate both a rocky economy and publicly stated aggressive '08 growth goals.
|
|
A Closer Look at Sales Incentive Plans (08/08)
Sales, for most software companies, comprises the largest percentage of operating expense. Executives often ask me, "What is the perfect sales compensation structure for software companies?" One of the biggest challenges is ensuring that a sales compensation plan effectively motivates sales performers to generate revenue in alignment with corporate goals, yet does not disproportionately escalate the cost of sales.
|
|
A Closer Look at G&A (06/08)
The "right" G&A ratio is particularly difficult to achieve for SaaS companies given their high, upfront overhead costs and the complexity of managing SaaS accounting and planning. We examine G&A operating metrics for 9 leading public SaaS vendors.
|
|
S&M Key Driver of Growth for SaaS Companies (05/08)
|
|
Looking at S&M expenses for a core group of publicly traded SaaS vendors, there appears to be a strong correlation between S&M spending and revenue growth.
|
|
Enhancing Growth & Profitability for SaaS Companies (4/08)
Lauren Kelley, CEO at OPEXEngine and Todd Gardner, CEO at SaaS Capital
Lauren Kelley and Todd Gardner draw on their combined industry expertise to explore various SaaS operating models – fast growth, profitability with steady growth, “perpetual license to subscription” transition – and the different benchmarks associated with each approach.
http://www.saas-capital.com/recordings
|
Strategic Operating Benchmarks for SaaS Companies (04/08)
The following presention provides an overview of SaaS market with statistics from our 2007 Operating Metrics Survey. CEO & Founder of OPEXEngine, provides insight into revenues growth, operating expenses, profitability and returns for investors.
|
Looking Back on 2007: It was a very good year for SaaS (04/07)
2007 was an interesting year for the technology market. As in other years, it had its winners and its losers. However, many mid-size SaaS vendors reached some impressive milestones and in general had a very good year. We have tracked 2007 financial results for 9 publicly traded SaaS vendors and were more than a little impressed with their overall performance.
|
G&A Expense Ratios (12/07)
OPEXEngine takes a closer look at G&A expenses. All companies would like to reduce G&A expenses, but it is particularly challenging for mid-sized software firms. Efficient G&A and overhead spending is essential for attaining and maintaining profitability.
|
Sales & Marketing Metrics (11/07)
OPEXEngine reviewed S&M spending for small-sized public software companies. We compailed 1st half 2007 S&M data for 11 public companies with SaaS and perpetual license models.
|
Q107 Operating Metrics for Mid-Sized, Public SaaS Companies (06/07)
Moving to a SaaS business model has important ramifications on revenue, expense and other operational metrics. The report compares the data for 13 public SaaS companies varying in size, but all are growing rapidly.
|
R&D Metrics (09/07)
OPEXEngine focused this analysis on R&D metrics for mid-sized public software companies. We identified R&D as critical for the budget process since it is more difficult to change course for R&D mid-year as easily as some other departments.
|
2006 Employee Productivity (08/07)
We compiled 2006 employee productivity and expense data for mid-sized public SaaS companies. OPEXEngine measures and compares software employee productivity and expense metrics as a tool for budget season.
|
|
